Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 345, 2022 11 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259474

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is one of the most frequent surgeries in the world. It is a very safe procedure mostly performed under topical anesthesia in outpatients centers. Due to the growing lack of anesthesiologists, cataract surgeries are more frequently performed without an anesthesiologist present in the operating room. Although extremely rare, life-threatening complications may occur. CASES PRESENTATION: We report two cases of cataract surgery complicated by severe hypotension that required emergency resuscitation in the immediate postoperative period and hospitalization in intensive care unit. Anaphylactic shock was confirmed in the first case and suspected in the second. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Even though cataract surgery is a very safe procedure, it is essential to ensure the presence of an anesthesiologist to manage potential, though extremely rare, life-threatening complications such as anaphylactic reactions.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Hipotensión , Humanos , Anestésicos Locales , Anestesia Local/métodos , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Hipotensión/etiología
2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(11): 3779-3784, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2100020

RESUMEN

Cataract is the most common cause of avoidable blindness in the world. While cataract surgery is continually evolving, manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) still remains highly relevant, especially with the threat of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still looming large over the world. MSICS today has a renewed significance, since it does not involve the use of any advanced machinery and relies mainly on easily sterilizable instruments, thereby making it a safe and inexpensive option. A self-sealing valvular tunnel entry forms the basis of MSICS, and proper positioning and construction of the tunnel is imperative to the success of the surgery. With more and more people demanding spectacle independence after surgery, it becomes important to have a thorough understanding of the factors that may influence surgically induced astigmatism in MSICS. These include the incision location, size and shape, configuration of the sclero-corneal tunnel, pre-existing ocular pathology, role of sutures, amongst others. With proper knowledge, many of these factors can be modulated to achieve best results.


Asunto(s)
Astigmatismo , COVID-19 , Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Astigmatismo/diagnóstico , Astigmatismo/etiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Catarata/complicaciones , Herida Quirúrgica/complicaciones
3.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 10945, 2021 05 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1284704

RESUMEN

This study was designed to determine the effect of a novel simulation-based training curriculum for scleral tunnel construction in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) compared with traditional training. In this multicenter, investigator-masked, randomized clinical trial, resident surgeons within 3 months of matriculation with minimal or no prior experience with MSICS were assigned either to simulation-based training, the Experimental Group (EG), or to conventional training, the Control Group (CG). EG residents were trained to perform scleral tunnel construction using a simulation-based curriculum (HelpMeSee Eye Surgery Simulator), while residents in the CG followed institution-specific curriculum before progressing to live surgery. Surgical videos of the first 20 attempts at tunnel construction were reviewed by masked video raters. The primary outcome was the total number of any of 9 pre-specified errors. On average, the total number of errors was 9.25 (95% CI 0-18.95) in the EG and 17.56 (95% CI 6.63-28.49) in the CG (P = 0.05); the number of major errors was 4.86 (95% CI 0.13-9.59) in the EG and 10.09 (95% CI 4.76-15.41) in the CG (P = 0.02); and the number of minor errors was 4.39 (95% CI 0-9.75) in the EG and 7.47 (95% CI 1.43-13.51) in the CG (P = 0.16). These results support that novice surgeons trained using the novel simulation-based curriculum performed fewer errors in their first 20 attempts at tunnel construction compared to those trained with a conventional curriculum.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Realidad Virtual , Adulto , Curriculum , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Curva de Aprendizaje , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Esclerótica/cirugía , Grabación en Video
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA